Laman Webantu KM2A1: 3740 File Size: 9.8 Kb * |
NewsWeek: The Last Days of Pinochet By Alfredo Sepulveda 6/2/2001 12:05 am Tue |
[Kami memaparkan kisah Pinochet ini sebagai iktibar buat rakyat
Malaysia, khususnya mereka yang masih teralpa dengan kemewahan
pembangunan mega tetapi tidak ambil perduli isu terkini. Kesibukkan
hidup ini bukan alasan untuk bersendiri alang-alang sesuatu yang
indah yang dikecapi. Kami juga turut menghargai perjuangan novelis terkemuka, Gabriel García
Márquez yang turut menjadi perangsang untuk menumbangkan kezaliman diktator
Pinochet di sebelah sini. Semoga penulis negara mengambil semangat yang
ada di dalam perjuangannya, khususnya yang masih menyorok di bawah meja.
Gabriel García Márquez adalah penulis yang mempelopori teknik aliran baru
'realisma magis' yang begitu terkenal di Amerika Latin. Beliau memenangi
Hadiah Nobel Sastera pada tahun 1982 dan seluruh dunia terkejut dengan
teknik kreativitinya. Beliau sanggup hidup bertahun-tahun dengan masyarakat^ Amerika Latin untuk menghayati hidup rakyat marhain.
- Editor] The Last Days of Pinochet A writer who grew up during the dictator's regime looks at life in Chile,
now and then By Alfredo Sepulveda Feb. 1 - Last week, a small crowd of noisy, mature women stood
in front of a house in La Dehesa, a wealthy suburb of Santiago,
Chile. They were singing and chanting, waving Chilean flags
and holding posters of former president Gen. Augusto Pinochet
smiling an avuncular smile. INSIDE THE HOUSE, history was in the making. For the first time in
his life, Pinochet was being interrogated by a judge about the fate of 72
political prisoners who were killed by a special army commando unit in
1973 after the coup that brought him to power. Pinochet told Judge Juan
Guzmán he never had anyone murdered, that he wasn't "a criminal."
When Guzmán left, he was jeered by the crowd. To them, Pinochet, 85,
is "Tata," grandpa. Tata or not, Pinochet is to be tried for murder, the
judge said this week. For 27 years, the strongman has haunted Chile. Some of his
people, however, were charmed. Pinochet's government, from 1973 to
1990, was an efficient machine that exiled, tortured and killed his
opponents-2,920 of them, according to the Rettig Commission, set up
in 1991 by the democratic government of Patricio Aylwin.
At the same time, the Pinochet machine established a capitalist
framework that shaped the most successful economy in Latin America,
with annual GDP growth of about 4.5 percent and megamalls just like in
the United States. Although extreme poverty was the country's No. 1
social issue - and still is - Chileans climbed the economic ladder
during Pinochet's time in power - many of them becoming immensely
and obscenely wealthy in the process.
Pinochet was defeated in a referendum in 1989. But he won more
than 40 percent of the votes and he continued to hold the support of the
country's business community. He remained commander in chief of the
army and later became a senator-for-life. It was only when he left for
London in 1998 for medical treatment that Pinochet's problems began.
He was arrested under an order issued by a Spanish judge for
human-right violations. The last days of Pinochet were under way.
I knew people who actually liked Pinochet. They were my relatives, my
classmates and my not-so-close friends.
I grew up under Pinochet. I knew I lived in a dictatorship. I knew
that Pinochet ruled with un puño de hierro, an iron fist. I knew that his
secret police killed people. For years, my aunt lived in hiding, and my
parents' best friends lived in exile (this before e-mail, so some of the
their letters received brisk proofreading from the government).
But Pinochet's Chile, for me, was not, say, Cambodia; it wasn't a
society ravaged by war. I knew people who actually liked Pinochet.
They were my relatives, my classmates and my not-so-close friends.
For them, Pinochet was a great man, a liberator. Someone who saved
us from being like what Cuba is today. An honest man who returned the
country to normalcy after the food shortages and unrest of Salvador
Allende's socialist government. But in this middle-class, suburban tranquillity, disconcerting
things were happening all around us. My grandmother once called my
father because mustachioed, sunglassed men were walking up and
down her street; she was alone and it frightened her. Later, my father
ended up under the bed with her while bursts of gunfire went off.
Pinochet's secret police were searching for members of an armed
opposition group a few doors down. One morning, at the Catholic school
I attended, we were made to pray for the soul of an army colonel who
had just been shot by a leftist group, just blocks away. One of our
classmates was shocked: the victim was one of his parents' best
friends. I didn't like Pinochet but assumed he would be in power forever.
There was a joke in Chile about a guy who travels to the 25th century
only to find Pinochet VIII. I knew there was a better way to live as a
country, but wasn't sure if we could someday achieve it.
By the mid-'80s, Chile's economy began to take off. Pinochet was
moving toward a complete liberalization of the economy. He privatized
industries, lowered taxes and promoted exports. Margaret Thatcher
approved from afar. If human-rights violations didn't strike you as
immoral, there was really little to complain about.
Were the Chileans who were pro-Pinochet unaware of the
human-rights violations committed by the armed forces or the secret
police? Some probably were. Others believed everything was a
campaign of lies orchestrated by international communism. Some
people thought that yes, there had been victims, but there was a war
that - thank God, they said - Pinochet and the army won.
On Jan. 5, the Chilean armed forces acknowledged for the first
time that its members had committed crimes against the people. The report
was issued after negotiations between the armed forces and human-rights
organizations. In it, the military disclosed information about the fate
of 180 political prisoners who had disappeared during the early '70s.
More than 100 of them, the report said, were dropped into the Pacific
Ocean. "I never ordered the execution of anybody,"
Pinochet told Judge Guzmán last week. It is hard to believe what
Pinochet says, even to his friends. They remember his words from the
1980s, at the peak of his power, that not a single leaf moved in Chile
without him knowing about it. Back then he was blunt, sharp and
sarcastic. Today, he is weak, possibly, as his lawyers say, suffering
from dementia. His political support has almost vanished. He has the lukewarm
support of the right, which sees him a symbol of the glorious past, but
voters are finally tuning him out. During the last presidential elections
in December 1999, the only candidate who claimed to represent
Pinochet's legacy (the general was being held in London at the time)
got less than 1 percent of the vote. Pinochet still controls the military,
but probably not all of them; most of his sidekicks are retired or dead.
The ultimate irony is that the current government of Ricardo Lagos
is a socialist one. Its goals are humble: to fight poverty, to keep the
economic growing - and to finally find out what became of the people
who disappeared during Pinochet's dictatorship.
In 1975, the Colombian novelist Gabriel García Márquez wrote
"The Autumn of the Patriarch," about an old Latin American dictator
who lived his last days all alone, demented, in a decrepit palace
surrounded by bird manure. After its publication, García Márquez
vowed to stop writing until Pinochet stepped down. (He eventually
changed his mind). Pinochet remained in power for many more years, in a way quite
unlike the writer García Márquez imagined. To see Pinochet now is to
have sympathy toward him. He is not the defiant, arms-crossed
general from 1973. He now has the kind of benevolence that comes
with old age. He moves with difficulty, wears a Polo shirt and a
baseball cap in summertime and has a close-knit family.
He's still grumpy, but funny: "How are you, general?," asked a TV
reporter who interviewed him Tuesday, right after it was confirmed that
he was under house arrest and would be tried for murder. "How do you
want me to be? I'm detained!" he said.
Once Tata is gone, it's his adversaries, paradoxically, who could
end up missing him most. Pinochet will probably carry to his grave a
secret his country wants desperately to know: Where are the people
who disappeared? Where are the ones no one has ever been able to
find? Alfredo Sepulveda is a writer and editor at El Mercurio in Santiago,
Chile. |