Laman Webantu KM2A1: 3036 File Size: 8.6 Kb * |
TJ Murtad dan Aqidah Antik UMNO By Kapal Berita 20/10/2000 8:08 pm Fri |
TJ Ringkas: Enakmen murtad yang diluluskan oleh DUN Perlis adalah
seperti undang2 "khalwat" UMNO. Ia adalah cara UMNO
mengabui Syariah untuk memperlekehkan Islam. Islam hanyalah
nama tetapi hipokrisi itulah permainan mereka.
Nilai2 Islam, ala-UMNO, hanyalah menambahkan gejala korup dan
kejadian tidak bermoral dinegara ini. Jika khalwat itu di
di implimentasikan dengan ikhlas, hampir semua pemipin umno,
dari MB kepada ADUN, dari Menteri Kabinet kepada MP, akan mendapati
diri mereka berakhir di mahkamah Syariah. Sebaliknya apa yang
berlaku kita dikejutkan sengan senario pasangan yang sudah
berkahwin secara sah dengan beberapa anak cucu ditahan dilokap
kerana tidak membawa sijil perkahwinan mereka yang sudah terlupa.
MB Perlis sendiri, Shahidan Kassim, mungkin menjadi orang pertama
yang menjadi mangsa Enakment Murtad Perlis, jika ia dilaksanakan.
Di Iran, penganut Bahaisma dibunuh kerana murtad. Shahidan tidak
pernah menafikan beliau adalah orang yang bersimpati dengan Bahai,
Malah sokongan beliau kepada Bahaisma itu memungkinkan beliau dihantar
ke Pusat Pembetulan Ugama sebagaimana yang tercatit dalam Enakmen
tersebut. Isu murtad adalah perkara yang berlainan. Mereka yang simpati atau
'liberal' yang melindungi si murtad atas alasan ugama tidak mengerti.
Ia bukan masalah kepercayaan. Ia bukannya untuk melindungi Islam - kerana
Islam tidak memerlukan perlindungan - dan PAS mewacanakan ia sebagai
jenayah berat tidak lain tidak bukan untuk menjaga keharmonian antara
pelabgai fahaman ugama. Tidak ada yang lebih memalukan utk satu keluarga muslim selain
mendapati salah seorang ahli keluarga mereka menjadi murtad. Si murtad
itu bagai seorang berkusta dan seluruh ahli keluarga dipandang sebagai
berkusta. Inilah realiti sosio dan sikologi yang skar dijelaskan.
Tiada muslim yang boleh mempercayai seseorang itu sanggup keluar
dari Islam kerana kurang keyakinan. Ini adalah tersangat benar. Jika
seseorang itu meninggalkan Isla,. selalunya untuk berkahwin atau dia
sudah tidak mahu berugama dan bermoral lagi.
Si murtad tidal sensitif kepada perasaan malu dan derita yang terpaksa
ditanggung oleh ahli keluarganya. Dan kepahitan itu nanti akan menimbulkan
ketegangan antara masyarakat. Bila seorang Kristian menganut Islam,
misalnya, dia menjadi seorang yang lebih "kristian" kerana dia tidak menolak
Nabi Isa (as), tetapi bila seorang muslim meninggalkan Islam, dia telah
menolak kenabian Muhammad (saw). Ini menerangkan perbedaan perasaan
bila murtad berlaku. Memang benar tidak dinyatakan dalam al Quran menyuruh untuk membunuh
si murtad tetapi ia termaktub di dalam syariah dalam beberapa situasi
tertentu. Kaum Yahudi diperingkat awal Islam telah mempermainkan
ajaran Islam untuk memperlekehkannya. Mereka islam sebelah pagi dan
murtad bila petangnya pula. Kini taktik yang sebegini masih dan telah
digunakan hingga ke hari ini. Dalam negara kita gejala seperti ini akan menimbulkan kesan
yang amat dahsyat. Jika inilah yang dimaksudkan dengan kebebasan berugama
kita hanyalah akan mengundang kecelakaan sosial.
Kematian adalah hukuman yang wajar untuk sesiapa yang mempermainkan ugama -
malah sebarang ugama. Ugama bukanlah umpama "selipar lama" yang
boleh dipakai dan dibuang seikut suka.
Selebihnya tidak diterjemah.... From http://harakahdaily.com FROM HARAKAH PRINT EDITION - October 16-31, 2000
Apostasy and UMNO's aqidah antics
by PKK The Faith Protection Bill just passed by the Perlis State Assembly, like
UMNO's 'khalwat' laws, is UMNO's way of circumventing Islamic Shari'ah and
ridiculing Islam. Islam is the name but hypocrisy is the game.
Injecting Islamic values, UMNO style, has only increased corruption and
immorality in the country. If the khalwat laws has been honestly
implemented, practically every UMNO politician, from the Menteri Besar to
the State assemblyman, from the federal minister to UMNO MP would have
found himself at one time or another in the Shari'ah court. Instead we have
the strange scenario of legally married couple with grand children being
locked up for committing khalwat for not carrying - like an amulet around
their waist - the marriage certificate which they have long forgotten.
The Perlis MB Shahidan Kassim himself would be the first victim of Perlis
Faith Protection Bill, if it ever comes into force. While Bahais were being
executed in Iran as apostates, Shahidan put at their disposal, few years
ago, the entire state apparatus and openly showed his sympathy for the
Bahais. He has never denied that he was a sympathiser of the Bahais. His
unabashed patronising of a sect which was originally a deviant group
challenging the Muslim fundamental belief in the finality of the
Prophethood is in itself a reason for him to be sent to the Faith
Correction Centre as provided in the Bill.
However the issue of apostasy is a different matter in Islam. Those
apologists and 'liberals' who defend apostates on the ground of freedom of
religion are missing the point. It is not simply a matter of belief. It is
not to protect Islam - Islam needs nobody's protection - that PAS wants
apostasy to be made a serious crime but to protect the present harmony and
goodwill between the different religious groups in this country.
There is nothing more shameful for a Muslim family than to have an apostate
among them. An apostate is like a leper and the whole family will be
treated like lepers. This is a sociological and a psychological reality
which is difficult to explain. No Muslim can believe that any one would
leave Islam out of religious conviction. This is invariably true. If anyone
leaves Islam, it must be either to marry a non-Muslim, or he or she could
not bother about religion and old fashioned morality.
The apostate is insensitive to the shame and pain he brings on the family
and the consequent bitterness his action might create between communities.
When a Christian converts to Islam, for example, he only becomes a better
Christian for he does not reject Jesus (peace be upon him), whereas when a
Muslim leaves Islam, he is making positive rejection of the prophethood of
Muhammad (peace be upon him). This explains the difference in feelings
about apostates among Muslims and non-Muslims.
It is true that there is nothing in the Qur'an commanding an apostate to be
put to death but it was prescribed in the Shari'ah to contain certain
special circumstances. During the early period of Islam in Madinah, Jews
adopted a peculiar way to scorn Islam: some of them would accept Islam in
the morning only to reject it in the evening to cast doubt on the character
of the Prophet and the revelation he received. This deliberate plot had to
be nipped in the bud and such murtads (apostates) were harshly dealt with.
The same tactic has been, and still is being, used by the enemies of Islam
ever since. In a country like ours, this could have a devastating effect; and if this
is naively accepted in the name of freedom of religion we are inviting
terrible social chaos. Death is the fitting punishment for anyone trivialising religion - any
religion. Religion is not to be treated like an old slipper, to cast aside
when worn out. Those 'liberals' and apologists who plead the case of those
'poor' unfortunate souls who 'converted' for marriage should realise that
those who forsake their religion for another for money or marriage are
absolutely depraved. Religion is not to be trifled with. It is the innermost being of a man. For
Muslims religion is still sacred - inspite of the fact that so much
materialistic thought has penetrated a small depraved section of Muslim
community. Religious freedom must also include freedom to retain one's
religion and therefore nobody should be forced to convert against his/her
conscience, for example, to get married a person of another religion.
Thus Islam's insistence of not allowing intermarriage, if taken to its
logical end, is against the freedom of religion these apologists and
'liberals' are fighting for. Are they ready to challenge this Islamic
injunction? If they are not, for obvious reasons, then they should just
hide their hypocrisy and stop mocking and trivialising religion by
suggesting that religion should have no role in public life. [PKK]
|